Host City: The largest meeting of cities and sports, business and cultural events
  • Login
  • Get Newsletter

#####

  • Home
  • HOST CITY 2023
    • Event Information
    • 2023 Agenda
    • Speakers
    • Hosted Buyer Programme
    • Sponsors & Partners
    • Conference Venue
    • Register
  • Past Events
    • HOST CITY 2022
      • Event Information
      • Agenda
      • Speakers
      • Post-Event Magazine
      • Host City 2022 Audio Playlist
    • HOST CITY 2021
      • Conference Recordings
  • Magazine
  • News
  • Contact Us

Event Management

You are here

Home
»
News
»
When to mediate or litigate in sports events

When to mediate or litigate in sports events

3rd May, 2016 Posted In Event Management Posted By: Ben Avison comments
Tweet
Sarah Lewis photographed speaking at HOST CITY 2015 (Photo copyright: Host City)
Sarah Lewis photographed speaking at HOST CITY 2015 (Photo copyright: Host City)

HOST CITY asked Sarah Lewis, Secretary General of the International Ski Federation (FIS) and the Association of Winter Olympic International Federations (AIOWF) whether mediation is an alternative to litigation in resolving sports disputes

“It’s important to draw a distinction where you actually can use mediation or an alternative dispute resolution method other than litigation. 

“Competition rules and doping offences are not areas where you can mediate, negotiate and so on; these have clear rules and they have to be respected for the integrity of the sport. 

“What you do need, when it comes to competition rules, is a solid internal procedure to have the possibility to appeal to a higher instance than the competition jury – they can make mistakes, so that needs to be verifiable.

“And then you also need the commitment that there will be an appeal possibility to the Centre for Arbitration of Sport (CAS), as the overall instance to check externally that your internal regulatory procedures are working in the correct way.

“From my perspective, as far as anti-doping offences are concerned, it’s a similar situation: an International Federation has to uphold the WADA rules. Then you have to defend those in an internal doping panel procedure and if there is an appeal, again can be appealed externally to CAS; that’s what is given in the code. 

“Then the areas where we have a certain experience where there could be room for negotiation concerns disputes – we’ve had dealings in two particular areas. One has been with a couple of serious accidents that have taken place in international competitions, which are organised under the FIS rules, that are overseen by the technical delegate appointed for the assignment by FIS. 

“Then there have been out of court discussions and negotiations, of course together with the insurance company who plays an important role there. In the one case we found a very good solution that involved supporting a foundation set up by the family in the athlete’s memory dedicated to supporting youngsters in his sport and improving safety measures. 

“The other area has been with non-competition regulations: interpretation of regulations connected to commercial branding and visibility; is a manufacturer a manufacturer or is it a commercial entity; what’s allowed and what isn’t allowed? That is also quite closely connected to Olympic rules.”

 

This exclusive interview was conducted by HOST CITY at LawAccord during the 2016 SportAccord Convention

 

Related Topics: Good Governance Law Anti-doping
Tweet

Search form

Twitter Feed

Tweets by @Host_City

Tag Cloud

Turkmenistan Digtal Media Dallas AGES WorldSkills Destination Marketing New Delhi European Tour Visit Scotland Modern Pentathlon

Newsletter Signup

Signup to receive the latest Host City updates directly to your inbox 

Signup Now

Host City is committed to the principle of Fair Work

Cavendish Group International Ltd. © 2019, All rights reserved. 2nd Floor Front, 116-118 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1PP, United Kingdom